Jump to content

Winter 2022-2023 | Discussion and Outlooks


NKYSnowLover

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MesoscaleBanding said:

IF...big if...we can get a killer last week or so of January & an extended cold/snowy 2-3 weeks into Feb., I'll gladly suffer through this garbage pattern we're stuck in right now. I'm just getting so tired of putting all my eggs into the basket of a backloaded winter. Give me an epic heart of meteorological winter for a change, lol. 

 

Hey, I'm ecstatic that we've had 2 snows & about 5 inches for month of DEC. It's been a while here. 

Edited by Grace
  • LIKE 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Grace said:

 

Hey, I'm ecstatic that we've had 2 snows & about 5 inches for mother of DEC. It's been a while here. 

The pre-Christmas storm was nice...can you imagine the mood in this forum if that storm hadn't happened? 😱

Edited by MesoscaleBanding
  • LIKE 1
  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, StLweatherjunkie said:

62 people died from that storm ... It would have been much worse, but then the storm disappeared?!?! 🤔

I should have been more specific. Was referring to the models depiction of a major storm blowing up over the Western Lakes inside 96hrs only to  trend it east and weaker till it bombed out way NE over southern Canada. That storm was more a giant wind machine for most of the midwest area and most of the snow was LES with the unfortunate deaths in Buffalo. Without the Lakes and LES it would have amounted to just a high wind event with wind chill warnings. Your location no doubt benefitted from LES

  • LIKE 1
  • THUMBS UP 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, 1816 said:

This is not scientifically possible

Neither is a solid month of temps 20+ degrees above average, but here it comes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Iceresistance said:

SAVAGE! Lol

 

 

 This guy's over the top but I sure wanna see how all of those who give him a hard time on Twitter respond to that tweet. Simon Lee just scolded him the other day when the weeklies were not showing that & he posted a LR GFS 10mb but now that it's showing the SPV weaken significantly we'll see what he says now. 

Here was Simon's tweet & hecwaa taking a jab at Mark. Pretty hilarious the next weekly run shows the significantly weakened PV! 😆 A lot of those PhD guys on twitter take offense at anyone who says anything without a PhD. Well there ya go Doc. 🤣

 

Edited by Grace
  • LOVE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, StormfanaticInd said:

This is just ugly folksimage.thumb.png.c98193ea0fcdd2c203d9ef01f90c29ee.png

 

4 hours ago, StormfanaticInd said:

At this rate Flowers will be blooming in a couple of weeks 🌼 🌸 🌻 😒

yes but lets also keep in context what that looks like at ground level in mid January. 15-20 degrees colder than what the current torch just was here at mid to upper 60s. Doesn't make it better, but it's at least suppressed by the heart of winter

gfs_T2m_us_52.png

Edited by Ohiobuckeye45
  • LIKE 2
  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Grace said:

 

 This guy's over the top but I sure wanna see how all of those who give him a hard time on Twitter respond to that tweet. Simon Lee just scolded him the other day when the weeklies were not showing that & he posted a LR GFS 10mb but now that it's showing the SPV weaken significantly we'll see what he says now. 

Here was Simon's tweet & hecwaa taking a jab at Mark. Pretty hilarious the next weekly run shows the significantly weakened PV! 😆 A lot of those PhD guys on twitter take offense at anyone who says anything without a PhD. Well there ya go Doc. 🤣

 

What I will never comprehend is why some think that every SSW dumps cold air into their area. Chances of a cold snap can increase due to a disrupted PV, but that does not mean that the impacts are defined neatly.

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Psu1313 said:

What I will never comprehend is why some think that every SSW dumps cold air into their area. Chances of a cold snap can increase due to a disrupted PV, but that does not mean that the impacts are defined neatly.

 

Absolutely correct! A severely disrupted PV might be better. SSW is a gamble. It's great when it pans out & sucks when it does not. 

But Simon has been dogging everyone saying anything about the SPV. So, yea it's funny. A true gotcha moment. "Experts" are not gods & a good dose of humble pie does them good to remind them. 

  • LIKE 1
  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Cary67 said:

I should have been more specific. Was referring to the models depiction of a major storm blowing up over the Western Lakes inside 96hrs only to  trend it east and weaker till it bombed out way NE over southern Canada. That storm was more a giant wind machine for most of the midwest area and most of the snow was LES with the unfortunate deaths in Buffalo. Without the Lakes and LES it would have amounted to just a high wind event with wind chill warnings. Your location no doubt benefitted from LES

I'm not sure specificity was the issue, because it was a massive blizzard.  Even though many of the headlines were about Buffalo, eastern Canada got absolutely crushed by the non-lake effect side of the storm. Sure the Midwest missed out on the worst of the blizzard, and IMHO we should consider ourselves lucky.

The major storm blowing up over the western lakes (that was only shown on a few model runs) would have almost certainly been even more deadly, destructive, and costly with Chicago, Milwaukee, Indianapolis, and many other smaller cities in the cross hairs. That's not too mention a crippling storm two days before Christmas would have screwed up travel even more than it was.

I understand that the large majority of us are snow weenies that only want our backyards buried, but sometimes missing a storm is a good thing

  • LIKE 1
  • THUMBS UP 2
  • THUMBS DOWN 1
  • BOMBOGENESIS 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist
32 minutes ago, StLweatherjunkie said:

I'd be curious to see this graphic for land areas only:

image.thumb.png.277a63be9ebf8ae749d5b157e48d7843.png

It is also global not just NH. I would also presume lower atmosphere means BL but that varies too much so maybe 925mb and lower?

Edited by so_whats_happening
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
56 minutes ago, StLweatherjunkie said:

I'm not sure specificity was the issue, because it was a massive blizzard.  Even though many of the headlines were about Buffalo, eastern Canada got absolutely crushed by the non-lake effect side of the storm. Sure the Midwest missed out on the worst of the blizzard, and IMHO we should consider ourselves lucky.

The major storm blowing up over the western lakes (that was only shown on a few model runs) would have almost certainly been even more deadly, destructive, and costly with Chicago, Milwaukee, Indianapolis, and many other smaller cities in the cross hairs. That's not too mention a crippling storm two days before Christmas would have screwed up travel even more than it was.

I understand that the large majority of us are snow weenies that only want our backyards buried, but sometimes missing a storm is a good thing

That storm did a number on us in the warm sector as well. 60-90mph winds (and that's excluding what happens on Mt Washington).  I didn't have any trees come down in my yard, but did lose power for a couple days.  There's lots of "widow makers" around, uprooted and snapped trees still hung up, waiting to fall.

    Any sticky, wet snow could be pretty problematic round here.

  • THUMBS UP 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 hours ago, Iceresistance said:

SAVAGE! Lol

 

Here's what he said 12 days ago.  At least he didn't #natgas it, energy traders are probably even bigger suckers than snow weenies for constant calls for a looming ice age.

  Not saying eventually it can't or won't happen, but I can't give credit for calling something, when someone always calls for it 

 

  • MELTING 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, StLweatherjunkie said:

I'd be curious to see this graphic for land areas only:

image.thumb.png.277a63be9ebf8ae749d5b157e48d7843.png

 

Nope. UAH covers global troposphere. It also has the ability to cover all levels of troposphere & stratosphere which is more helpful in monitoring the global climate. And is better because you're not dealing with measuring stations surrounded by concrete or asphalt in in very urban areas that can kind of skew in a small degree.

Screenshot_20230106-070950_Chrome.thumb.jpg.fca823a3002003b803635bcefd94fcf7.jpg

It's just another really good tool. 

You might can do some research here:

https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/climate/

https://www.uah.edu/essc/weather-products/global-temperature-report

 

  • THUMBS UP 1
  • THUMBS DOWN 1
  • THANKS 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MaineJay said:

Here's what he said 12 days ago.  At least he didn't #natgas it, energy traders are probably even bigger suckers than snow weenies for constant calls for a looming ice age.

  Not saying eventually it can't or won't happen, but I can't give credit for calling something, when someone always calls for it 

 

 

No credit to him. He's overboard or seems it. However, he did predict the DEC big cold shot & took flack from the PhD guys as well. I don't know if he knows what he's doing or not. 

I just think its funny when "experts" dog someone then end up eating their words. More humility is needed. 

Edited by Grace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...