Jump to content

Winter 2022-2023 | Discussion and Outlooks


NKYSnowLover

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, MaineJay said:

Admittedly, I'm very new to the EFI so I won't really comment on it, other than it appears (to me) to show the dump west, bleed east type regime.

 There's explanation on how to read the charts below the D5-9 chart.

Link to data.

https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/charts/catalogue/efi2web_2t?facets=undefined&time=2022121100,0,2022121100&day=10-15&quantile=50&area=North America

Days 5-9, 2m temps 

Screenshot_20221211-090315.png.73b247d94603b8d1610a5d89c7c89d6a.png

 

Days 10-15

Screenshot_20221211-090422.png.358a8ba18d6c22d7fc919fa339f33eeb.png

 

These are the EFI images I'm accustomed to viewing: https://satable.ncep.noaa.gov/efi/# ... I didn't even know this was accessible until @Ingyball said so a few days ago. He may have already shared it, but I like it since it focuses on weather hazard kind of information. Can't view anything past day 7 though. 

This thread is probably most interested in the snow column and the High Plains storm is a great learning example. I'll show wind and snow charts for both days of the event.

Day 1, a shift of tails of 2 and EFI >0.9 means extreme snow amounts by South Dakota standards with less extreme values where high winds are likely to accompany snowfall (western NE and northeast CO). Conclusion, snow amounts in SD are more likely to be record breaking than wind gusts anywhere in the CONUS.

image.png.f7b247fecd540abff26164a10876c9af.pngimage.png.5ddf1c2c80074aeae525da04a205f78e.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Day 2 still has very seasonally/regionally unusual snowfall, but amounts are less likely to be record breaking. Winds remain fairly weak in the area of heaviest snow, at least compared to that area's climatology. The Dakotas are a windy place so blizzard conditions may still occur, but the snow aspect of the storm is likely to be more impactful than the wind aspect.

image.png.c0b4159d0ba0c34122e41d0c13cf71fc.pngimage.png.dc6d37fc68de2e72047b5270753603fe.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A snowy portion of this system then visits my area then the northeast too with some unusually large snowfall amounts possible on the northwest shores of several Great Lakes where climatology is relatively low. While winds should be gusty as this tracks east, winds don't appear to be seasonally/regionally unusual so I didn't bother including those images. 

image.png.8a512aa62b6acf3c96b6aab31010b5e1.pngimage.png.17c07be2e73d23f1600e359a748023cc.pngimage.png.d372b7c65257c8365dd33efb72a0cc28.png

Edited by StLweatherjunkie
  • LIKE 3
  • THANKS 1
  • LOVE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StLweatherjunkie said:

These are the EFI images I'm accustomed to viewing: https://satable.ncep.noaa.gov/efi/# ... I didn't even know this was accessible until @Ingyball said so a few days ago. He may have already shared it, but I like it since it focuses on weather hazard kind of information. Can't view anything past day 7 though. 

This thread is probably most interested in the snow column and the High Plains storm is a great learning example. I'll show wind and snow charts for both days of the event.

Day 1, a shift of tails of 2 and EFI >0.9 means extreme snow amounts by South Dakota standards with less extreme values where high winds are likely to accompany snowfall (western NE and northeast CO). Conclusion, snow amounts in SD are more likely to be record breaking than wind gusts anywhere in the CONUS.

image.png.f7b247fecd540abff26164a10876c9af.pngimage.png.5ddf1c2c80074aeae525da04a205f78e.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Day 2 still has very seasonally/regionally unusual snowfall, but amounts are less likely to be record breaking. Winds remain fairly weak in the area of heaviest snow, at least compared to that area's climatology. The Dakotas are a windy place so blizzard conditions may still occur, but the snow aspect of the storm is likely to be more impactful than the wind aspect.

image.png.c0b4159d0ba0c34122e41d0c13cf71fc.pngimage.png.dc6d37fc68de2e72047b5270753603fe.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A snowy portion of this system then visits my area then the northeast too with some unusually large snowfall amounts possible on the northwest shores of several Great Lakes where climatology is relatively low. While winds should be gusty as this tracks east, winds don't appear to be seasonally/regionally unusual so I didn't bother including those images. 

image.png.8a512aa62b6acf3c96b6aab31010b5e1.pngimage.png.17c07be2e73d23f1600e359a748023cc.pngimage.png.d372b7c65257c8365dd33efb72a0cc28.png

I just loaded this on a different screen and the formatting is all sorts of fudged up. Does it look like a mess to anyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, StLweatherjunkie said:

I just loaded this on a different screen and the formatting is all sorts of fudged up. Does it look like a mess to anyone else?

Came up as a chart for me, but clicking on the header of a parameter brought up the map.

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, StLweatherjunkie said:

This is depressingly hilarious. The Keweenaw is on another level, I found one pixel of 89" in there 🤣

image.png.d9d7f7cd2e69c2280a664b74e257f500.png

Depressing?? Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist

It feels like I'm in Ohio again lol. I need to hope we get hit with snow on the front end here and if not then it's live and die by clipper systems and hope that snow adds up over time lol. I think suppressed is the way to go. Should work out well for Texas and the East Coast. 

  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...