Jump to content

Jan. 19-20th, 2024 | Winter Storm Speculation


telejunkie

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, so_whats_happening said:

All good.

So when I mentioned temps at the surface and 925mb in my previous post that is solely to state that temps can go as high as that but still have reasonable snow ratios above 10:1, more likely they will end up closer to 10:1 though. The NWS post is spot on and those are the most important factors to consider. The best way to describe it is there is a balance between moisture and temperature, the more moisture but warmer temp the further left you go in the snowflake chart. It can still accumulate well but you use up more moisture and that hurts the potential of maximizing snowfall output. Now when you have a scenario like we have coming up where there is less moisture available so the temps become rather important but it is the temps aloft that are the important part not at the surface. 

Surface temps are correlated to how much cold air is pressing into the region so if we have extremely cold temps aloft the surface temps will be notably colder but then we get issues of moisture availability and irregular snowflakes think micro flakes in that scenario. They fall the ground gets coated but you get hours and hours of that and maybe only accumulate 1-2". As time goes on more moisture pushes into the region from warmer areas (think of warm air advection) the upper levels warm up to a more suitable level and there is more moisture availability to allow for near perfect conditions for snow growth. If you add too much moisture we start to slide left on the scale and then get heavy wet snows but all the while this is happening surface temps could stay the same. It is aloft that matters notably from 850 to about 600mb that matters the most. 

It is a big reason why when we get coastal storms the area NW of 95 into the mountains tend to get the most snow because the balance between moisture and temps with strong lift is near perfect while closer to 95 and the Jersey shore tend to still get snow but it is an extremely heavy wet snow. Both areas may have the same amount of QPF lets use 1" as an example so Jersey and 95 corridor get 6-10" with that there snow ratios are about 6:1 to about 10:1 while areas NW get 12-16" so there ratios are more along the line of 12:1-16:1 the biggest reason the temps aloft are colder NW and get to more suitable levels for good dendritic growth. It is rather rare to stay at one specific snow ratio the whole storm though and they tend to only happen with these weaker systems that throw moisture in. 

Temps in the column of 850-700mb may only be closer to say -6 closer to 95 while NW gets closer to -10 or -12. If we start to go colder ratios go up of course but the accumulation rate tends to weaken as the flakes become irregular and the dendritic growth zone moves out of the best lifting region. Less moisture also shows up in colder temps but if lift is strong enough it can overcome that issue and still produce think clippers in that scenario. It really is a fine balance though and surface temps only play a role in moisture availability and stickage. You want low levels (surface-850mb) moist so that when your lifting mechanism gets to you there is enough moisture to produce but you don't want too much or it hurts growth potential.

Thanks for your time and weather speak. Much appreciated. 

  • LIKE 1
  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Chris2333 said:

Reason 203 why you can’t trust weather apps (even weather underground). Yes I put the obligatory grill in the photo  

 

IMG_6474.png

IMG_6475.jpeg

You're the only one getting Fog.  Do you know how much Fog you're going to get?  🤪

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rheino said:

IMG_1901.thumb.jpeg.efa9da49460136b68d1f7b3169eede71.jpegOur grill shot. 3+ today. Snizzle atm, waiting to see if pivot produces more. Bowie md

I always had a problem grilling eggs.  They just kept falling down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
12 minutes ago, Undertakerson2.0 said:

Kind of OT, somewhat related though

This is Jim who, waaaay back in Accu Days was known to us as a 16y.o. aspiring met - went by OSUWx2 or some such. We named him Poster of the Year one year (same year Jesse kicked him off the forums LOL) He is now an actual Met out of NWS Cleveland 

image.thumb.png.c75bef00226143d92bf07ab909e13f61.png

So... Get him over here... 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
8 hours ago, so_whats_happening said:

All good.

So when I mentioned temps at the surface and 925mb in my previous post that is solely to state that temps can go as high as that but still have reasonable snow ratios above 10:1, more likely they will end up closer to 10:1 though. The NWS post is spot on and those are the most important factors to consider. The best way to describe it is there is a balance between moisture and temperature, the more moisture but warmer temp the further left you go in the snowflake chart. It can still accumulate well but you use up more moisture and that hurts the potential of maximizing snowfall output. Now when you have a scenario like we have coming up where there is less moisture available so the temps become rather important but it is the temps aloft that are the important part not at the surface. 

Surface temps are correlated to how much cold air is pressing into the region so if we have extremely cold temps aloft the surface temps will be notably colder but then we get issues of moisture availability and irregular snowflakes think micro flakes in that scenario. They fall the ground gets coated but you get hours and hours of that and maybe only accumulate 1-2". As time goes on more moisture pushes into the region from warmer areas (think of warm air advection) the upper levels warm up to a more suitable level and there is more moisture availability to allow for near perfect conditions for snow growth. If you add too much moisture we start to slide left on the scale and then get heavy wet snows but all the while this is happening surface temps could stay the same. It is aloft that matters notably from 850 to about 600mb that matters the most. 

It is a big reason why when we get coastal storms the area NW of 95 into the mountains tend to get the most snow because the balance between moisture and temps with strong lift is near perfect while closer to 95 and the Jersey shore tend to still get snow but it is an extremely heavy wet snow. Both areas may have the same amount of QPF lets use 1" as an example so Jersey and 95 corridor get 6-10" with that there snow ratios are about 6:1 to about 10:1 while areas NW get 12-16" so there ratios are more along the line of 12:1-16:1 the biggest reason the temps aloft are colder NW and get to more suitable levels for good dendritic growth. It is rather rare to stay at one specific snow ratio the whole storm though and they tend to only happen with these weaker systems that throw moisture in. 

Temps in the column of 850-700mb may only be closer to say -6 closer to 95 while NW gets closer to -10 or -12. If we start to go colder ratios go up of course but the accumulation rate tends to weaken as the flakes become irregular and the dendritic growth zone moves out of the best lifting region. Less moisture also shows up in colder temps but if lift is strong enough it can overcome that issue and still produce think clippers in that scenario. It really is a fine balance though and surface temps only play a role in moisture availability and stickage. You want low levels (surface-850mb) moist so that when your lifting mechanism gets to you there is enough moisture to produce but you don't want too much or it hurts growth potential.

 

7 hours ago, so_whats_happening said:

Another important thing I wanna throw out here is snowfall intensity, this is based off of visibility. 

Heavy snow is 1/4 mile or less

Moderate snow is above a 1/4 mile but less than or equal to 5/8ths of a mile (typically shown at 1/2 mile at ASOS)

Light snow is considered above 5/8ths of a mile (typically shown 3/4 mile or above at ASOS).

 

So when you see a station reporting 3/4mile visibility this is still considered light snow. 1/2 mile gets switched to moderate snow. and 1/4 mile is heavy snow.

You tend to get snowfall rates of 1" per hour around 1/2 mile visibility and less than 1" per hour with 3/4 mile visibility. 1/4 mile and less visibility pushes you closer to 2"+ per hour rates.

This is all just from my experience of working at the airport for snowfall rates.

Recommended

  • LIKE 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
2 minutes ago, Wtkidz said:

IMG_0553.gif

Snow doesn't seem to be making it out of WV into VA. Seems like the mountains often wring it out and we don't get much from snow coming from the west.

We got 1.25" overnight, and it's been mood flakes all morning that haven't amounted to anything.

  • SAD 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2024 at 8:53 AM, stormsurf said:

Im so happy to have found you all again.  

You may not remember me from the Accu days, mostly a lurker, but always enjoyed this bunch.

I dont add much to the discussion, although you think I would have learned more over the years 😜....mostly just zingers here and there.

Glad to be back and around so much weather knowledge....the boards I have tried were super BORING.  

Agree on that.  I joined one forum last year and posted and no responses.  7 months later I got a welcome response.  The moderator said something to the effect of welcome, this is a relaxed forum compared to others.  I figured, yeah 7 months for a response is extremely relaxed.  Needless to say I never went back again.

  • LIKE 1
  • &$!#% 1
  • YUCK 1
  • THUMBS DOWN 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
On 1/18/2024 at 8:53 AM, stormsurf said:

Im so happy to have found you all again.  

You may not remember me from the Accu days, mostly a lurker, but always enjoyed this bunch.

I dont add much to the discussion, although you think I would have learned more over the years 😜....mostly just zingers here and there.

Glad to be back and around so much weather knowledge....the boards I have tried were super BORING.  

Welcome! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mt Holly went backwards and upped totals: In the last 12 hours they've shifted a lot of 4-6 to 2-4 now 3-4".

 

I am assuming they feel the heavier echos will make it more north.

 

StormTotalSnow.thumb.jpg.fb4a61bafa46c7a54e66c42201208daf.jpg

Edited by mikeysed
  • THINKING 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
1 minute ago, mikeysed said:

Mt Holly went backwards and upped totals: In the last 12 hours they've shifted a lot of 4-6 to 2-4 now 3-4".

 

I am assuming they feel the heavier echos will make it more north.

 

StormTotalSnow.thumb.jpg.fb4a61bafa46c7a54e66c42201208daf.jpg

Wherever the cut off is on those bands, those just S and E will receive a nice thump. 

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Uscg Ast said:

Wherever the cut off is on those bands, those just S and E will receive a nice thump. 

Yep. ALMOST to me, 3 towns away about 15 miles to my south :

 

image.thumb.png.0630197fc11faae107985940ef1ac8eb.png

  • SNOWMAN 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JUST started snowing here.  Supposed to get 4-6 but looks like just around 3.  But, I'm not complaining! 😊

Edited by DLisa
  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mikeysed said:

Mt Holly went backwards and upped totals: In the last 12 hours they've shifted a lot of 4-6 to 2-4 now 3-4".

 

I am assuming they feel the heavier echos will make it more north.

 

StormTotalSnow.thumb.jpg.fb4a61bafa46c7a54e66c42201208daf.jpg

Yea they up our totals again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...