Jump to content

Jan. 19-20th, 2024 | Winter Storm Speculation


telejunkie

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Undertakerson2.0 said:

If I still went to the trouble of issuing snow guess maps, I'd put a "low confidence" label on it. 

Yea head scratcher again. For 2 days models were targeting LV , now some are moving sweet spot towards Philly and east. Not sure if it is still the moving target It, or models sensing more coastal involvement. Temps dropping a little, but ocean still warmish .

  • THUMBS UP 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RTC3-LAST CHANCE said:

Yea head scratcher again. For 2 days models were targeting LV , now some are moving sweet spot towards Philly and east. Not sure if it is still the moving target It, or models sensing more coastal involvement. Temps dropping a little, but ocean still warmish .

Its the gulf stream that keeps LI warmer than it should be in the winter.  Really messes with snowstorms though.  Makes it very irritating for snow lovers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RTC3-LAST CHANCE said:

Yea head scratcher again. For 2 days models were targeting LV , now some are moving sweet spot towards Philly and east. Not sure if it is still the moving target It, or models sensing more coastal involvement. Temps dropping a little, but ocean still warmish .

some are now sweet spotting So Lancaster and just East of me. That is why I think the handoff has to be different than before - no CTP snowdome which would come from a slow or late handoff as the shortwave swings in from the OH vly. 

Between that timing, and the potential IT influence, it's hard to be high end confident

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Main change for this late morning update is to nudge snowfall totals up slightly in the SErn zones. NAM continues to place a (second?) band of good lift and instability aloft over the Lower Susq in the aftn hrs. The SLRs also are progged to get higher (up to 18:1) thru the day there. So, even keeping the QPF the same would support a slight bump of an inch. The 00Z HREF also supports a bump for the higher elevs of Northumberland/Columbia Cos with the higher probs of 1"+ rates there in mid-day. Additionally there would be a little upslope with a N wind there. So, that may be a tweak to make with a later update - which could necessitate expanding the advy into there. But, we`d like to see the 12Z HREF and GFS which have just started to arrive before making those types of changes. - CTP

Dang model huggers (haha) 

To my eye, they are mentioning the IT without using the term 

Edited by Undertakerson2.0
add language
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Social Media Crew

This is probably irrelevant.. but on radar (granted it's the composite), you can see some light returns in eastern PA. Any chance this may be indicative of where the trough sets up?

Screenshot2024-01-18at10_26_38AM.thumb.png.9d26a40d0ca33af4b13dc93fe155586f.png

Edited by Penn State
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, clm said:

Its the gulf stream that keeps LI warmer than it should be in the winter.  Really messes with snowstorms though.  Makes it very irritating for snow lovers.

Yes, nice point there. Air temps factor in, but yea that current really effects. Summers are like the Pythagorean Theory trying to figure out why the water temps are warm or cold.

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Undertakerson2.0 said:

Main change for this late morning update is to nudge snowfall totals up slightly in the SErn zones. NAM continues to place a (second?) band of good lift and instability aloft over the Lower Susq in the aftn hrs. The SLRs also are progged to get higher (up to 18:1) thru the day there. So, even keeping the QPF the same would support a slight bump of an inch. The 00Z HREF also supports a bump for the higher elevs of Northumberland/Columbia Cos with the higher probs of 1"+ rates there in mid-day. Additionally there would be a little upslope with a N wind there. So, that may be a tweak to make with a later update - which could necessitate expanding the advy into there. But, we`d like to see the 12Z HREF and GFS which have just started to arrive before making those types of changes. - CTP

Dang model huggers (haha) 

Temperatures would not support 18:1 ratios, no? 

Screenshot_20240118-103016.png

Edited by Lazman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rickrd said:

Just for the record in the thread since all info is relevant. Issued last night 1/17/24 at 10:45 pm

IMG_8737.jpeg

That's ONE BIG TROUGH in Pa. Dude must feel for Iggles fans losing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rickrd said:

Just for the record in the thread since all info is relevant. Issued last night 1/17/24 at 10:45 pm

IMG_8737.jpeg

He posted a little bit ago with big changes coming to that map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lazman said:

Temperatures would not support 18:1 ratios, no? 

More than simply temps affect ratios, there is also at least one other element (vertical velocity especially within the DGZ) also factors in. So I'm not gonna argue the pro's point on that. 

Also, the just coming in GFS certainly seems to indicate a more concise handoff. This likely bodes well for anyone who thought CTP may land in dry slot ville

  • THINKING 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lazman said:

That's ONE BIG TROUGH in Pa. Dude must feel for Iggles fans losing. 

Yes he did. He also stated:

"If these snow rates actually materialize the next updated snow map will probably have 6 inches into a good portion of Central and southern NJ  Again I am worried about the snow ratios producing amounts closer to 8 inches portions of  eastern PA  including Lehigh Valley and the Philly Metro area."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Undertakerson2.0 said:

Please tell me there's a Snobal post along these lines Stretch. 

The best I could do on such short notice. 

9Hr6.gif

Basement-Dweller-thumb-1.jpg

  • LAUGH 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...