Jump to content

Winter 2023-2024 | Discussion and Outlooks


NKYSnowLover

Recommended Posts

  • Admin
6 hours ago, Grace said:

Did I have a post removed?? I could've swore I responded to @JDClapper on my take of the winter on & off. I'd like an explanation if it was removed. Thanks

@MaineJay

I don't see anything in the deleted content. It may have been a forum software thing. Apologies if there was an issue.

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

ECMWF weekly forecast from 1/16 for this week.

20240131105021-0e8e9c4fd8e0d6182aeb87781b32ed8defcfd6ac2.thumb.png.5772a406dbe345a141dd3513b053218b.png

Here's what we are getting.  It wasn't terrible, just looks like it's biggest blunder was having the pattern rotated 15° counter clockwise, and it did miss the Alaska region pretty badly.

eps_z500aMean_namer_1.thumb.png.d03a8e87a28708cfe8266e97a1751329.png

 

 

  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RobB said:

1/31 0Z NAEFS 

2024013100_054@007_E1_north@america_I_NAEFS@TEMPERATURE_anomaly@probability@combined@week2_198.png

 

This is not towards Rob, but just a clarification for all of us to remember about NAEFS. 

FYI, the NAEFS is not contradicting models. These are probabilities for FEB 8-14. It's really warm during that period & models have cooling beginning around 14th. The NAEFS probabilities are based on the same ensemble data: blend of GEPS & GEFS. 

"The NAEFS combines the Canadian MSC (Global Environmental Multiscale Model) and the US NWS global ensemble prediction systems (Global Forecast System), improving probabilistic operational guidance over what can be built from any individual country's ensemble."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Ensemble_Forecast_System#:~:text=The NAEFS combines the Canadian,from any individual country's ensemble.

 

So, NAEFS is just a blend of GEPS & GEFS. So those probabilities are not contradicting the model data at all. Those probabilities will begin to back off as the data covers lie a FEB 11-17...so in about 2-3 days. The CPC 8-14 is mostly based on a blend of all the Ensemble data as well. 

Here's the GEFS 8-14, 2m Temps & 500mb loops:

gfs-ens_T2ma_namer_fh240-384(2).thumb.gif.e53e6d25429ff90f8032af87300fcd42.gif

gfs-ens_z500a_namer_fh240-384.thumb.gif.df989d465ef978df09132396595260e2.gif

 

Here's the GEPS 8-14, 2m Temps & 500mb loops:

gem-ens_T2ma_namer_fh240-384(1).thumb.gif.81cd1b9847552523224e5c6d7a368f28.gif

gem-ens_z500a_namer_fh240-384.thumb.gif.198ae66bb61b58c8ab9e04f286482c60.gif

 

SUMMARY:

So...NAEFS probabilities are based on the above data. DAYS 8-13 are much above normal, cool down shows up more Days 14-15. Therefore NAEFS probabilities are going to be RED. 

I know many of you know this but not everyone does. 

 

 

MY THOUGHTS:

While I believe we improve mid-month I personally do not believe in a sudden flip. We certainly improve mid-Feb & then a little seasonal but potentially stronger,  more sustainable colder looking pattern looks more likely last week of FEB & well into MAR. 

Edited by Grace
  • LIKE 3
  • FACEPALM 1
  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RobB said:

 

 

I think it was terrible. Other methods were not showing cold. Other methods showing mid-month cool down now, at least agree with curent LR modeling, giving current model data more believability. LR is certainly not the gospel but I think they're correctly seeing some changes for the better for many of us. 

Edited by Grace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Grace said:

 

This is not towards Rob, but just a clarification for all of us to remember about NAEFS. 

FYI, the NAEFS is not contradicting models. These are probabilities for FEB 8-14. It's really warm during that period & models have cooling beginning around 14th. The NAEFS probabilities are based on the same ensemble data: blend of GEPS & GEFS. 

"The NAEFS combines the Canadian MSC (Global Environmental Multiscale Model) and the US NWS global ensemble prediction systems (Global Forecast System), improving probabilistic operational guidance over what can be built from any individual country's ensemble."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Ensemble_Forecast_System#:~:text=The NAEFS combines the Canadian,from any individual country's ensemble.

 

So, NAEFS is just a blend of GEPS & GEFS. So those probabilities are not contradicting the model data at all. Those probabilities will begin to back off as the data covers lie a FEB 11-17...so in about 2-3 days. The CPC 8-14 is mostly based on a blend of all the Ensemble data as well. 

Here's the GEFS 8-14, 2m Temps & 500mb loops:

gfs-ens_T2ma_namer_fh240-384(2).thumb.gif.e53e6d25429ff90f8032af87300fcd42.gif

gfs-ens_z500a_namer_fh240-384.thumb.gif.df989d465ef978df09132396595260e2.gif

 

Here's the GEPS 8-14, 2m Temps & 500mb loops:

gem-ens_T2ma_namer_fh240-384(1).thumb.gif.81cd1b9847552523224e5c6d7a368f28.gif

gem-ens_z500a_namer_fh240-384.thumb.gif.198ae66bb61b58c8ab9e04f286482c60.gif

 

SUMMARY:

So...NAEFS probabilities are based on the above data. DAYS 8-13 are much above normal, cool down shows up more Days 14-15. Therefore NAEFS probabilities are going to be RED. 

I know many of you know this but not everyone does. 

 

 

Thanks-this is very helpful explanation and makes a lot of sense.  

 

Our weather consultant had a mid season update and they also echo the mid-late Feb cool down and storm chances, so I feel better about that.  We really need a few more events to use the salt up-otherwise we won't have space to accept the remainder of our order!

  • LIKE 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Hot take here, but in looking at the snowfall totals for January in my post in in Daily Obs, most of the NEMA was at or above normal for snowfall.  NYC area was the only area that was lagging pretty badly.  Most of Mount Holly, Baltimore, State College, Binghamton, Gray, Burlington, Albany, Norton where NowData accumulation graphs were provided, the snowfall tracked near or above normal.  

  • LIKE 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Grace said:

 

This is not towards Rob, but just a clarification for all of us to remember about NAEFS. 

FYI, the NAEFS is not contradicting models. These are probabilities for FEB 8-14. It's really warm during that period & models have cooling beginning around 14th. The NAEFS probabilities are based on the same ensemble data: blend of GEPS & GEFS. 

"The NAEFS combines the Canadian MSC (Global Environmental Multiscale Model) and the US NWS global ensemble prediction systems (Global Forecast System), improving probabilistic operational guidance over what can be built from any individual country's ensemble."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_Ensemble_Forecast_System#:~:text=The NAEFS combines the Canadian,from any individual country's ensemble.

 

So, NAEFS is just a blend of GEPS & GEFS. So those probabilities are not contradicting the model data at all. Those probabilities will begin to back off as the data covers lie a FEB 11-17...so in about 2-3 days. The CPC 8-14 is mostly based on a blend of all the Ensemble data as well. 

Here's the GEFS 8-14, 2m Temps & 500mb loops:

gfs-ens_T2ma_namer_fh240-384(2).thumb.gif.e53e6d25429ff90f8032af87300fcd42.gif

gfs-ens_z500a_namer_fh240-384.thumb.gif.df989d465ef978df09132396595260e2.gif

 

Here's the GEPS 8-14, 2m Temps & 500mb loops:

gem-ens_T2ma_namer_fh240-384(1).thumb.gif.81cd1b9847552523224e5c6d7a368f28.gif

gem-ens_z500a_namer_fh240-384.thumb.gif.198ae66bb61b58c8ab9e04f286482c60.gif

 

SUMMARY:

So...NAEFS probabilities are based on the above data. DAYS 8-13 are much above normal, cool down shows up more Days 14-15. Therefore NAEFS probabilities are going to be RED. 

I know many of you know this but not everyone does. 

 

 

MY THOUGHTS:

While I believe we improve mid-month I personally do not believe in a sudden flip. We certainly improve mid-Feb & then a little seasonal but potentially stronger,  more sustainable colder looking pattern looks more likely last week of FEB & well into MAR. 

I’m in (was in) the “not everyone knows this” camp. 🙂  Thanks!

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StretchCT said:

Hot take here, but in looking at the snowfall totals for January in my post in in Daily Obs, most of the NEMA was at or above normal for snowfall.  NYC area was the only area that was lagging pretty badly.  Most of Mount Holly, Baltimore, State College, Binghamton, Gray, Burlington, Albany, Norton where NowData accumulation graphs were provided, the snowfall tracked near or above normal.  

Here's an image to put some numbers behind this. 

Some notable standouts - Syracuse with <1/3 of average; Phil-DC at or above, most others are lagging on the order of a half foot and more - some much more (Erie, Pgh, Cleveland)

20240131_113403.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1 hour ago, Undertakerson2.0 said:

Here's an image to put some numbers behind this. 

Some notable standouts - Syracuse with <1/3 of average; Phil-DC at or above, most others are lagging on the order of a half foot and more - some much more (Erie, Pgh, Cleveland)

20240131_113403.jpg

Season v just January.  But you gave me something else to do now. Thanks.

Harrisburg January

image.png.99101fc7b00cb5ec4e5c0c7e5d993de7.png

Harrisburg season

image.png.db021fb6fa2a099484fd4ffa3984abd6.png

Williamsport season

image.png.3bc028bcf1e9cae5b6d0f86c474890e8.png

Altoona season

image.png.e0fb9e27a3ccf57b64d0e3793ad44dc4.png

Still closer than I thought. More in the Daily Obs for the NE

Edited by StretchCT
  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Undertakerson2.0 said:

Here's an image to put some numbers behind this. 

Some notable standouts - Syracuse with <1/3 of average; Phil-DC at or above, most others are lagging on the order of a half foot and more - some much more (Erie, Pgh, Cleveland)

20240131_113403.jpg

Erie is proof we don’t see winds out of the north dumping cold anymore 👀 or rarely anyway  

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Penn State said:

George Strait's latest hit.. The Snow Drifts of Old Mexico.

floop-gfs-2024013112.prateptype_cat-met_na.gif.59fd273d622c8633dc87409a962d7a0d.gif

Not sure what’s more impressive the snow in Mexico or that cat 2/3 winter hurricane in the arctic circle 

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From LOT AFD:

pressed south by blocking over central NOAM, we`ll have an
exceptionally long period of benign weather with surface high
pressure predominating through mid next week. Winds will be
generally from the northeast, resulting in rare winter time
"cooler near the lake" conditions lakeside amidst otherwise well
above normal temperatures in the 40s (with upside potential
pending sky cover trends). Next chance of precipitation will
come beyond day 7. The tendency during this stretch will be to
wonder if "winter is over", though consistent long range
ensemble guidance has been pointing toward the return of a more
wintry pattern (western ridging and eastern troughing with high
latitude blocking establishing), at least temperature wise,
toward Valentine`s Day.

Castro
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Birds sure chirping today like it’s March first and not February first. Also the next ten days around here sure have the almost Saint Patrick’s day feel and not it’s still winter feel. Regardless of what we squeeze out of what’s left of winter this has been two back to back garbage winters…. I mean just look at it outside does not scream February screams I need to get my yard tools and lawn mower ready

IMG_3501.jpeg

Edited by Hassaywx1223
  • DISAPPOINTED 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...