Jump to content

January 24-25, 2023 | Plains/MW/GL/OV Winter Storm


MesoscaleBanding

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BuckeyeGal said:

Okay, y'all. I went to look at the different approaching energies for this weekend.. and I'm wondering if we just do one thread for both of them? The clipper for Fri-Sat is quickly followed by a larger system. Should I keep them separate or combine? What say you?

Together is fine with me.

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, RobB said:

Sorry if this has already been posted.

 

ILN AFD:

.SHORT TERM /6 AM TUESDAY MORNING THROUGH WEDNESDAY/...

Quiet weather during the day Tuesday as strong shortwave trough
digs through the base of the longer wave trough to the west and
begins to rapidly eject out into the Ohio Valley by Wednesday
morning. Surface low to slowly deepen as the wave moves through
the Ohio Valley.

Primary concern is the development of an WNW-ESE oriented band
of heavy precipitation on Tuesday night after midnight moving
quickly northeast across the forecast area through Wednesday
morning. This is on the nose of strong low level jet, with
accompanied very strong frontogenetical response and lateral
banding. Forecast soundings suggest that despite tremendous low
level warm advection, that this will be offset by the degree of
vertical motion. Dynamic cooling of arriving warm nose seems to
suggest a 3-5 hour period of heavy snow is likely to cross much
of the forecast area centered on the morning commute. This is
concerning for travel/impacts. This signal right now seems most
centered on southwest Ohio/southeast Indiana, but there is a
trend to involving more of Kentucky with successive receipt of
ensemble and deterministic runs. Have expanded the Winter Storm
Watch collaboratively southward with this forecast cycle, but
starting to feel strongly with late arriving ensemble
information this afternoon that more expansion - and
significantly so - is perhaps needed. While there is some
concern with warm nose walking right up to the 0C line in
forecast soundings that overall warm advection becomes so strong
that sleet/mix may dominate in northern Kentucky which would
greatly limit totals, but regardless, this would still make for
a treacherous morning commute so further shifts will need to
consider an expansion of the watch south into more of the Ohio
River area if ensemble trends hold. This is much less about
criteria - and much more about heavy />1" hour/ rates of
snow/sleet arriving right before and during the morning commute
for a large portion of the forecast area.

So not only do we have some uncertainty about the
magnitude of the warm advection and how this impacts
rates/amounts in this warm advection band, but there is
uncertainty on the path of the low moving through the forecast
area. A track up the west side of the forecast area would mean a
faster transition to rain and warming boundary layer from south
to north on Wednesday, while a track across southern Ohio would
slow this warming and delay improvement especially along/west of
I-71. A very complex storm and forecast adjustments to snow
totals and watch / warning alignments should be expected.

With the main deformation/comma head snows remaining /mostly/
west of the forecast area (west central Ohio and southeast
Indiana will get in on some of this), the primary concern with
this system for our forecast area is centered on this band of
heavy precipitation Tuesday night into Wednesday morning,
especially as it relates to impacts surrounding the morning
commute.

I read that and all I see is waa waa waa. Warm air always wins around here. I remember a storm from 2 or so years ago that was forecasted w rain snow line about 75 miles south of me just 6 hours prior and I got all rain.

  • THUMBS UP 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wnwniner said:

I read that and all I see is waa waa waa. Warm air always wins around here. I remember a storm from 2 or so years ago that was forecasted w rain snow line about 75 miles south of me just 6 hours prior and I got all rain.

This is different as we know the warm air is coming. Nearly Everyone is predicted to get above freezing. I think it’s about how much snow we can get before that happens really. I mean forecast high here from NWS is 43 so we know we will get warm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist

SREF and NAM continue to show a bigger deal here. If that plays out, it'll be a nice coup for both models. The SREF does tend to be on the warmer side, but for this setup, I think that's okay. We warmed up a bit more than expected today, so that's something to note. I do expect most areas to radiate out again tonight so that could help with accumulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Ok, the first SREF Tracker update:

15 and 21Z included.  I'll include the standard yada yada for any newcomers. The (XYZ) is the SREF station.

3.3" is a popular number with the first 4 locations.  Remember, these will be totals different than the 10:1 maps.  Any errors or omission, please let me know.

AND that's it for me tonight.  See you all in the AM.

 

SREF Plume Tracker®, the mean snow amount of the short range ensembles of various weather models.  Great way to not only see the trends near you, but also what areas are being favored by the models. Sometimes they work out fairly well, other times not so well. They are updated every 6 hours but on a ~4-5 hr delay.

The plots can be found here. https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/sref/srefplumes/?SID=CLE   This link is for Cleveland, click on the dot nearest to where you live. The tighter the grouping of the individual members, the more confidence in the forecast. (Want your town added below??...just let me know.)

15z & 21Z SREF update.(also includes 15z, 21Z, 3Z, 9Z) 

Toledo (TOL)- 3.5/3.3/x/x   Cleveland (CLE)- 2.6/3.3/x/x     

Youngstown (YNG)- 2.8/3.3/x/x   

Findlay (FDY)- 3.2/3.3/x/x     Marion, OH (MNN)- 3.3/2.9/x/x     

Sidney, OH (ROD)- 3.7/3.6/x/x         

Dayton-S (MGY)- 2.5/2.7/x/x    Hamilton, OH (HAO)- 2.3/2.1/x/x   

Covington (CVG)- 2.0/1.7/x/x    

Columbus (CMH)- 2.2/2.4/x/x      Mt. Vernon, OH- 3.1/3.1/x/x     

Zanesville (ZZV)- 1.6/1.9/x/x       

Flint (FNT)- 3.5/4.7/x/x      Detroit (DTW)- 3.8/4.0/x/x          

Indy (IND)- 4.7/5.1/x/x     Decatur IL (DEC)- 5.0/6.0/x/x     

Shawnee OK (SNL)- 8.0/7.8/x/x

  • LIKE 2
  • THUMBS UP 1
  • THANKS 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hiramite said:

Ok, the first SREF Tracker update:

15 and 21Z included.  I'll include the standard yada yada for any newcomers. The (XYZ) is the SREF station.

3.3" is a popular number with the first 4 locations.  Remember, these will be totals different than the 10:1 maps.  Any errors or omission, please let me know.

AND that's it for me tonight.  See you all in the AM.

 

SREF Plume Tracker®, the mean snow amount of the short range ensembles of various weather models.  Great way to not only see the trends near you, but also what areas are being favored by the models. Sometimes they work out fairly well, other times not so well. They are updated every 6 hours but on a ~4-5 hr delay.

 

The plots can be found here. https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/sref/srefplumes/?SID=CLE   This link is for Cleveland, click on the dot nearest to where you live. The tighter the grouping of the individual members, the more confidence in the forecast. (Want your town added below??...just let me know.)

 

15z & 21Z SREF update.(also includes 15z, 21Z, 3Z, 9Z) 

 

Toledo (TOL)- 3.5/3.3/x/x   Cleveland (CLE)- 2.6/3.3/x/x     

Youngstown (YNG)- 2.8/3.3/x/x   

 

Findlay (FDY)- 3.2/3.3/x/x     Marion, OH (MNN)- 3.3/2.9/x/x     

Sidney, OH (ROD)- 3.7/3.6/x/x         

 

Dayton-S (MGY)- 2.5/2.7/x/x    Hamilton, OH (HAO)- 2.3/2.1/x/x   

Covington (CVG)- 2.0/1.7/x/x    

 

Columbus (CMH)- 2.2/2.4/x/x      Mt. Vernon, OH- 3.1/3.1/x/x     

Zanesville (ZZV)- 1.6/1.9/x/x       

 

Flint (FNT)- 3.5/4.7/x/x      Detroit (DTW)- 3.8/4.0/x/x          

 

Indy (IND)- 4.7/5.1/x/x     Decatur IL (DEC)- 5.0/6.0/x/x     

Shawnee OK (SNL)- 8.0/7.8/x/x

 

My area has gone down slightly, but that was expected given slight deviation.

 

Shawnee works fine since it has a OK Mesonet station with it too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...