Jump to content

May 7-28, 2022 | Severe Weather/MCS Sequence


ElectricStorm

Recommended Posts

  • Meteorologist
58 minutes ago, ClicheVortex2014 said:

Damn, we're already on GOES18? Feels like 16 just got launched

 

IIRC it fixed some issues with GOES-17 but we are already working on our next-gen satellites aiming for 2030s I think. 

  • THANKS 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClicheVortex2014 said:

Absolutely disgusting.

To be fair, it's really just a dry cold front. High today is almost what you'd expected in mid-July. 

 

Looks like that Ohio pulled an Uno Reverse Card against the Cold Front! 😆

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist

The MCV that developed from the storms in western Texas last night is basically going through cyclogenesis in Minnesota.

You need surface convergence/divergence aloft or pre-existing vorticity... which is the case here in the form of the MCV... approaching a stationary front. Really not much different from your textbook cyclogenesis. It was a stationary front earlier but now you can clearly see a north-south oriented "cold front" which is more like an outflow boundary that's being used like a cold front.

Right now we're in the open stage of cyclogenesis

image.thumb.png.6e115fe721d1c54e45ff421bd080f2b1.png

image.png.56b361bb6b5c45ef472cc06bacef0c7f.png

Edited by ClicheVortex2014
  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is a little difficult to pick out on radar

Quote

...A TORNADO WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 730 PM CDT FOR WESTERN
SIBLEY AND NORTHWESTERN NICOLLET COUNTIES...
    
At 654 PM CDT, a confirmed tornado was located 6 miles southwest of
Lafayette, or 7 miles north of New Ulm, moving northeast at 45 mph.

HAZARD...Damaging tornado and quarter size hail.

SOURCE...Weather spotters confirmed tornado near New Ulm.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist

0z MPX is just slightly north of the warm front but damn, that shear. Surface observations show that mid-upper 60 degree dew points aren't far away from MPX now, which would be a huge improvement from this. Would greatly increase instability but I don't think there'd be much surface-based instability. Warm the temps by a few degrees and maybe.

image.thumb.png.9260a4d30eada1add0189a783a4808c0.png

Edited by ClicheVortex2014
  • WOW 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are telling me this dent in the velocity is a supercell? Here's what I see: lots of rain and wind convergence at the squall, with 59 kts base velocity coming directly at the radar.

 

kmpx_20220512_0042_BR_05a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist
11 minutes ago, Chinook said:

So you are telling me this dent in the velocity is a supercell? Here's what I see: lots of rain and wind convergence at the squall, with 59 kts base velocity coming directly at the radar.

 

kmpx_20220512_0042_BR_05a.jpg

Not that it really matters, but there was a mesocyclone signature at 6000 feet, arguably up to 11k feet. You don't see that kind of reflectivity or velocity signature with non-supercells.

First image is 6k feet, second 11k feet

image.thumb.png.57898787f20175f2b501479d6c9f7336.png

051122-9.PNG

Edited by ClicheVortex2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...