Jump to content

April 27-May 6, 2022 | Tornado Outbreak Sequence


ElectricStorm

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, OKwx_2001 said:

12z GFS is a dryline machine my goodness 

There's another potential setup in Early May as well with the CAPE is very close to 5000, and it's only trending higher. o_o

 

EDIT: There is CAPE above 5000 in SW Oklahoma on May 3rd at 21z (I really hope that the GFS is not trying for a 5/3/1999 again, I've heard that the SPC Soundings showed CAPE over 5000 in Norman on that fateful day)

Edited by Iceresistance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist
34 minutes ago, Iceresistance said:

There's another potential setup in Early May as well with the CAPE is very close to 5000, and it's only trending higher. o_o

 

EDIT: There is CAPE above 5000 in SW Oklahoma on May 3rd at 21z (I really hope that the GFS is not trying for a 5/3/1999 again, I've heard that the SPC Soundings showed CAPE over 5000 in Norman on that fateful day)

It's possible. It appears the 0z balloon popped in the upper troposphere before it hit the EL so this sounding is an underestimate. I doubt that 0z sounding would've yielded 5000 sbcape though, given how close it was to the EL.

But it did have a -10 LI which is significant.

image.png.0d466fd7dfaec5270ad5d0a0560801bb.png

image.png.bb7b71b22efaf5a60cebc992535b1743.png

 

 

Same thing happened with 5/31/13 except 5000+ sbcape was actually observed at 18z

image.png.20dd87cd86eaf34a7864bf3c989dafa4.png

image.png

Edited by ClicheVortex2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Iceresistance said:

There's another potential setup in Early May as well with the CAPE is very close to 5000, and it's only trending higher. o_o

 

EDIT: There is CAPE above 5000 in SW Oklahoma on May 3rd at 21z (I really hope that the GFS is not trying for a 5/3/1999 again, I've heard that the SPC Soundings showed CAPE over 5000 in Norman on that fateful day)

Yeah I don't trust anything that far out. It's cool to look at on the models but that's about it at that range 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, OKwx_2001 said:

12z CIPS analogs more significant than the 0z but not as crazy as yesterday's 12z, although that was about as crazy as it gets. Some pretty big days on here 

https://www.eas.slu.edu/CIPS/ANALOG/DFHR.php?reg=GP&fhr=F108&rundt=2022042512&map=thbSVR

It's more in Kansas, which is the best case for town if I'm going to be in Mississippi on Friday.

Edited by Iceresistance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, OKwx_2001 said:

Yeah I don't trust anything that far out. It's cool to look at on the models but that's about it at that range 

The GEFS is slowly trending higher with the Supercell Composite across the Southern Plains as well, so there's a maybe with this setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Iceresistance said:

It's more in Kansas, which is the best case for town if I'm going to be in Mississippi on Friday.

There's a lot in KS, but there's some pretty big days for OK on that list too

14 minutes ago, Iceresistance said:

The GEFS is slowly trending higher with the Supercell Composite across the Southern Plains as well, so there's a maybe with this setup.

Yeah it could be something it's just too far out to really know for sure 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist
9 minutes ago, Iceresistance said:

I'm actually impressed that the GEFS has been able to sniff out something potentially big 2 weeks in advance.

2 weeks is impressive but to be fair, all we need to get severe weather at this time of year is a western trough. Saying there will be severe weather in a time period would be easy, but nailing where and how significant is still the hardest part.

It's kinda like being in December or January and seeing the PV over the Eastern US... there's gonna be lake effect snow somewhere. 'tis the season.

Edited by ClicheVortex2014
  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist

IIRC, GFS really wanted to keep the central Plains capped on Friday but we know that didn't happen. NAM had less capping and better low-level moisture when it came into range. It was onto something with the capping thing but notsomuch moisture.

So if history repeats itself here, could be trouble.

  • LIKE 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ClicheVortex2014 said:

IIRC, GFS really wanted to keep the central Plains capped on Friday but we know that didn't happen. NAM had less capping and better low-level moisture when it came into range. It was onto something with the capping thing but notsomuch moisture.

So if history repeats itself here, could be trouble.

It has a higher chance of repeating itself because there's less dry air from the drought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist

Hoping the dryline sets up further west so I can go out and spot/chase. Definitely won't be heading to southeast Kansas if that's where storms go. Would have to settle for pics of behind the storm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 00z models (GFS, Canadian, UKMET) do have a good amount of agreement on a deeper low pressure in Kansas at 96 hours with 60 dew points, dryline, and somewhere around 40 kt - 50 kt winds at 500mb moving into the warm sector.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meteorologist

SPC will probably want to see more consistency between models but Euro's joined GFS with respect to possibly significant severe weather. How they get it done is the difference. But if we did a Venn Diagram of the two models and their threat areas, they'd overlap in SE KS and maybe a part of NE OK. Northward toward the warm front/low/triple point gets an honorable mention because of the strength of the system but there are some signs that capping may be an issue.

Area average sounding for most of eastern Oklahoma

image.thumb.png.2c611f823af6da5a291be7e1f91d2090.png

image.png

 

Model comparison loop shows that they definitely differ

GFS Is uncapped at 21z for SE KS/NE OK area but capped at 0z. Euro can't go to 21z at this range but in some locations it just has a weak cap. At 0z, Euro's got weaker instability and weaker shear but less cinh

models-2022042600-f096.mlcape_hodo.us_c.gif

Edited by ClicheVortex2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z GFS less capped at 0z but it's still there though it looks pretty breakable. I'm not sold on a big outbreak yet though. Too much model differences, and if the Euro solution verifies this will be a much tamer event. Not to mention the cap could be a problem as well. Moisture is ok but not great, would like to see dewpoints a bit higher for a bigger event. I like the current slight risk from SPC. For now, I think this could end up as a mostly isolated event, anything that does form could be pretty explosive.

Obviously still 4 days out and a lot can change so I'm not saying the higher end solutions are impossible but I'm not really seeing it just yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting into the extreme long-ranges of the NAM, actually a very similar environment to what the GFS depicts, but there's one huge problem, there's a lot less speed shear. We've seen high cape low shear events produce before, super notably Jarrell, TX. (Jarrell had 3000 more cape than this sounding and 4000 is already considered extreme) Jarrell was one of those events where you've got to watch for boundaries and gravity waves from morning MCS's and even then conditions have to be enhanced from those boundaries in such specific ways that something like Jarrell likely won't happen again for a very long time. Either way you've got a powder keg with great directional shear, it's a day to watch IMO. This setup like most drylines will likely be boom or bust.

909274850_Screenshot2022-04-26094432.thumb.png.8a08741a15c2da5ec93cd43e4bbf52b2.png

Edited by Neoncyclone
  • SHOCKED 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, OKwx_2001 said:

Cap bust on 12z GFS

That being said, GFS seems to have a strong cap bias, and the parameters are still looking solid on this run. Can't wait for the CAM's to start getting in range over the next couple days.

The GEFS & SREF also has high parameters, but the SREF has a complete cap bust compared to maybe some on the GEFS.

 

KFOR also said that it's unlikely that any storm could develop because the Euro model has a very strong cap over Oklahoma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...